<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Marco Fanizza | LIP6 - QI Team</title><link>https://qi.lip6.fr/people/marco-fanizza/</link><atom:link href="https://qi.lip6.fr/people/marco-fanizza/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><description>Marco Fanizza</description><generator>Hugo Blox Builder (https://hugoblox.com)</generator><language>en-us</language><copyright>© 2022 LIP6 Quantum Information Team</copyright><lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Marco Fanizza - Non-iid hypothesis testing: from classical to quantum</title><link>https://qi.lip6.fr/seminars/2025-11-05-marco-fanizza/</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://qi.lip6.fr/seminars/2025-11-05-marco-fanizza/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="non-iid-hypothesis-testing-from-classical-to-quantum"&gt;Non-iid hypothesis testing: from classical to quantum&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This seminar, given by Marco Fanizza, will happend on 05 November 2025, at 13:0.
It will take place in Room étage 1 - 25-26/105.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Find a map of the campus &lt;a href="https://sciences.sorbonne-universite.fr/vie-de-campus-sciences/accueil-vie-pratique/plan-du-campus" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id="abstract"&gt;Abstract&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We study hypothesis testing (aka state certification) in the non-identically distributed setting. A recent work (Garg et al. 2023) considered the classical case, in which one is given (independent) samples from $T$ unknown probability distributions $p_1, \ldots, p_T$ on $[d]={1,2, \ldots, d}$, and one wishes to accept/reject the hypothesis that their average $p_{\text {avg }}$ equals a known hypothesis distribution $q$. Garg et al. showed that if one has just $c=2$ samples from each $p_i$, and provided $T \gg \frac{\sqrt{d}}{\epsilon^2}+\frac{1}{\epsilon^4}$, one can (whp) distinguish $p_{\text {avg }}=q$ from $\mathrm{d}&lt;em&gt;{\mathrm{TV}}\left(p&lt;/em&gt;{\text {avg }}, q\right)&amp;gt;\epsilon$. This nearly matches the optimal result for the classical iid setting (namely, $T \gg \frac{\sqrt{d}}{\epsilon^2}$ ). Besides optimally improving this result (and generalizing to tolerant testing with more stringent distance measures), we study the analogous problem of hypothesis testing for non-identical quantum states. Here we uncover an unexpected phenomenon: for any $d$-dimensional hypothesis state $\sigma$, and given just a single copy ( $c=1$ ) of each state $\rho_1, \ldots, \rho_T$, one can distinguish $\rho_{\text {avg }}=\sigma$ from $\mathrm{D}&lt;em&gt;{\mathrm{tr}}\left(\rho&lt;/em&gt;{\text {avg }}, \sigma\right)&amp;gt;\epsilon$ provided $T \gg d / \epsilon^2$. (Again, we generalize to tolerant testing with more stringent distance measures.) This matches the optimal result for the iid case, which is surprising because doing this with $c=1$ is provably impossible in the classical case. Extending the iid result on identity testing between unknown states, we also show that given a single copy of each state $\rho_1, \cdots, \rho_T$ and $\sigma_1, \cdots, \sigma_T$, it is possible to distinguish between $\rho_{\text {avg }}=\sigma_{\text {avg }}$ from $\mathrm{D}&lt;em&gt;{\mathrm{tr}}\left(\rho&lt;/em&gt;{\text {avg }}, \sigma_{\text {avg }}\right)&amp;gt;\epsilon$ provided $T \gg d / \epsilon^2$. A technical tool we introduce may be of independent interest: an Efron-Stein inequality, and more generally an Efron-Stein decomposition, in the quantum setting.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>